Iconoclast

I'm not going to agree with talking heads here. First of all, the level of degradation that has happened in the political environment in the American culture is almost beyond inexcusable. The level of black representation of the people of these United States is not getting in their government is not only inexcusable. It is not politically the nature of the Republic of these United States is dramatically changing.

That being said, people need to first understand that ever since Andrew Jackson created the electoral College, the United States at that time stop to being a democracy and became a republic. Which is basically a representative democracy. Andrew Jackson did this because he felt as he said to the Congress at the time, that the masses meaning people of the general population, were not intelligent enough to be able to make a decision pursuant to who should run the country without having some sort of intermediary agent involved, such that the choices of the mass population could then in fact be modified somewhat pursuant to a more accurate interpretation of the general population's collective voice.

That being said, over the generations, the level of representation of the people of these United States has in fact gotten, has been diminished more and more every year. The level of representation of the general population now have, in Congress, is far less than it was for decades ago. This is because the PAC groups, and other political interest groups, using tens of millions of dollars, attempt to gain a closer political proximity to the Congress of these United States, and the members of the Congress, as a result of those dollars that they spent with the Congress. While the Constitution does not allow all for access to be granted based on monies paid to the Congress pursuant to this particular aspect of contribution by PAC groups and other groups; the fact that these groups are able to gain a closer proximity to the Congress as a result of these monies paid, is not really indicative of a lack of representation of the general population have with Congress, but in addition, indicated how much less representative United States Congress is of the actual people of this country.

[More:]

That being said, the question at hand is whether or not Mr. Bush, and the other members who in fact have violated the Constitution, and constitutional law, should in fact be tried for their crimes. The Maschke family have all been constitutionalists. And what this basically means, is that the Maschke family have always, as patriots, been supporters of constitutional law, as the absolute rule of law by which the United States would be demonstrated, and/or realized, by the general citizenry of these United States, but would also be demonstrated globally, to the other countries around the world.

With this in mind, while the political ramifications may not be as attractive, that does not diminish the constitutional responsibility that does in fact exist. When laws are broken in this country, there is a provision in the Constitution, and in almost all constabulary rules and regulations throughout the United States, called, salutary neglect. The salutary neglect is simply the right that any constabulary may have to enforce any given law, at its discretion. This discretionary room for executing certain loss, was given to the constabulary in order to maintain, the common good, in their own states, as those states pertain to constitutional law.

However, using salutary neglect, in order to ascertain as to whether the Constitution should be upheld, pursuant to crimes by elected officials, especially at the executive and congressional level of these United States, is a rather serious mistake. It is, because we're not talking about discretionary room, pursuant to the common good. We're talking about elected officials, in the executive and congressional, and/or legislative branches of our federal government. And were talking about whether or not salutary neglect should be applied pursuant to Federal, and constitutional, crimes that various aspects of these two branches of government, have in fact for trade, against the American people, and against the Constitution of these United States.

Again with this in mind, if we in fact step back, from taking any action, pursuant to the crimes that have in fact been committed in the executive and legislative branches and the judiciary branches or of the executive government, the government of these United States, then we in fact less than the legal impact, and/or legal basis, for all the laws in these United States. For the crimes are in fact being talked about, are crimes that were in fact committed against the Constitution of these United States, which is in fact, the supreme law of the entire United States government and the United States people. So when crimes are in fact committed against the Constitution, our choices very simple and clear. Were you to uphold the law, or we do not.

While the religiously hysterical, and politically hysterical and totally and completely politically irresponsible, white fundamentalist Christian Republicans, are demanding that the law not be upheld, and that no one should actually be tried for crimes they have committed against the Constitution; doing that, if anyone actually agrees to that stand, is not only contrition, pursuant to constitutional law; meaning that such a posture would in fact be aiding and abetting the participants federal crimes against the Constitution, and that no penalty for violating constitutional law would in fact be exacted upon the criminals who violated the Constitution. And again I say taking such a stand would then diminish the entire legal standing of the Constitution itself. Furthermore, it would be, as the white fundamentalist Christians who are completely and totally religiously hysterical and politically hysterical in addition to being totally completely politically are responsible, exactly what they want. For the religiously hysterical and politically hysterical white fundamentalist Christians are desperate to see the Constitution of these United States completely and totally destroyed and then replaced with specifically, the white fundamentalist Christian brand of the Christian Bible. And this to that end, whereby all other religions in these United States would then be ruled illegal and all participants in any religion other than white fundamentalist Christianity, would be then subject to imprisonment, execution, or slavery.

So, the question as to whether or not to uphold the Constitution, and to in fact, exact constitutional punishment, pursuant to constitutional violations, by participants in the executive, judiciary, and legislative branches of our government, now becomes one that is much more clear than it otherwise might appear to be. For not to take any action, would be to give the religiously hysterical, and politically hysterical, and totally and completely politically are responsible, white fundamentalist Christians. And subsequently the religiously hysterical, and politically hysterical white fundamentalist Christian Republicans, exactly what they want, which is a devaluation of constitutional law, such that more of the white fundamentalist Christian Bible, specifically, could be introduced as law in these United States, thereby replacing certain aspects of the Constitution, such that eventually the Constitution would then be totally and completely replaced by the white fundamentalist Christian Bible over time.

And going down that road, is not only very dangerous, it is in fact, pursuant to current constitutional law, not only a federal crime, it is treason.

So as to whether or not to actually take a stand strong enough whereby constitutional law is upheld, the choice is now much more clear that it was at the outset of when I began talking regarding this particular post. For the American people do not take a strong stand pursuant to constitutional law, and the crimes against the Constitution by members of the executive, and legislative, and judiciary branches of our American government, is for the American people to admit, by their own actions, that they no longer support the Constitution of these United States as a rule of law for the people of this country, or the United States. And doing that, as I said before, is not only something is very dangerous to even consider; but if we do that, then the very true and honest beacon of hope that has been polite forward the world, will in fact be lost. For while people want to consider that our freedoms and our spirit has in fact been the beacon of hope for people throughout the world; those things have only been illuminations to other countries and other people, as a result of one piece of paper. And that piece of paper, is the Constitution of these United States.

When other nations other people and looked to the United States for hope and for guidance, they have always, in all cases, use the Constitution of these United States as the basis for how they would map their own freedoms and map their own social structure and their political structure, such that they would be able to imitate, in one way or another, the inherent and illuminated freedoms that the United States was in fact founded upon.

And for us to in fact consider, in any way, shape, or form, to turn our backs on the very document that is secured the freedoms for all Americans in this country, and been the illumination for other countries to demonstrate similar freedoms and their own cultures, as I said before, it is something that I do not should ever be considered lightly. And I do not believe it should be considered on the basis of political expediency. The Constitution of these United States is not something that should be arbitrated over with any degree of lightheartedness. Millions of people have died in defense of that Constitution. Millions of people have given their lives in defense of that piece of paper. Every single American in these United States is required by federal law, by the law of the Constitution, to swear to that document. To swear that they will in fact uphold that document and defend all that it entails. Each one of us as American citizens is required to take that oath. For anyone to consider, under any circumstances that taking such an oath, are in fact taking on that responsibility, should in fact not be part of being an American, is to then again, as I said before, to cave in to the religiously hysterical and politically hysterical white fundamentalist Christian movement, which has alter history, work as hard as they could to destroy the Constitution of these United States.

The Calhoun family, goes back a long way in these United States. During the signing of the Declaration of Independence, the fact is, regardless of any of the hype on TV, the John Adams and Senator Calhoun from the Carolinas had a very long debate on the very eve of the signing of the Declaration of Independence. In that debate, Senator Calhoun, John Calhoun, presented to the First Continental Congress, that under no circumstances would the southern states signed a declaration of these United States, unless they were allowed to keep their slaves. According to historical documents, Thomas Jefferson, who wrote the Declaration of Independence, and put the provision into the Declaration of Independence, granting the black Americans their freedom. And his purpose, which was in fact explained by Ben Franklin during the debate, was done and ordered to make sure that the inalienable rights that were being granted to all people in this country extended to, all people. Senator Calhoun and the southern states did not believe that the black Americans were people. And therefore did not, under any circumstances want the inalienable rights of freedom life and liberty, to be stowed upon elements that they did not consider to be human beings. And of course then the debate began.

After several hours, John Adams relented, and Thomas Jefferson took the line the declaration, whereby the black Americans would be looked upon in such a way so that they would also be entitled to inalienable rights of life liberty and pursuit of happiness. But thanks to remains that the Calhoun family was still bent on destroying the Constitution in any way they possibly could. And he was the progeny of the original Senator Calhoun at the signing of the Declaration of Independence, who in 1860 stood up before the Congress of these United States, and declared strongly, that under no circumstances would the southern states give up their rights to own black Americans as pieces of property and to kill them whenever they wanted. Furthermore, that wasn't enough. Because then the religiously hysterical white fundamentalist Christians then began the Civil War in these United States with the intention of destroying the Constitution and destroying the union of this great nation. When Abraham Lincoln was able to heal the nation as a result of this terrible bloody civil war, he was going to at the same time pay reparation back to the black Americans who he felt had been mistreated pursuant to the Constitution and to the concept of the inalienable rights of life liberty and pursuit of happiness which the Constitution provides for.

Still bent on destroying the Constitution, the religiously hysterical white fundamentalist Christians sent John Wilkes Booth to Ford's theater were Lincoln was watching a program. And John Wilkes Booth shot president Lincoln to death by shooting him in the head. And again, the government of these United States almost fell into tyranny as a result of the religiously hysterical. White fundamentalist Christians effort to destroy the Constitution of these United States. However, the union remained strong in the Constitution was upheld.

Still, that wasn't enough to satisfy the religiously hysterical and politically hysterical white fundamentalist Christians of these United States. So in 1932, under president Hoover, one World War I veterans who had not been paid for their service during the war, and it was now so desperate that their families were starving, went to Washington, DC to beg president Hoover for some form of compensation; Hoover's response was to send Colonel Douglas MacArthur out to the Washington Mall and have the veterans removed. And then as a result of that confrontation, the battle of Washington in 1932, in Washington, DC, took place. Hundreds were killed. Hundreds of men and women and children were shot to death by Colonel Douglas MacArthur and his troops on the Washington Mall, and in the surrounding buildings. My grandfather, the national Republican committee man, for all northeastern Ohio, and who had just been relieved of duty as the US customs inspector for the entire United States, and who was a Jew, who journeyed with other Republicans, to Washington, DC in 1932, to stop the governmental takeover, that was being engineered by the religiously hysterical and politically hysterical white fundamentalist Christians, who are attempting to overthrow the government of these United States under president Hoover, and to supplant the American government with a white fundamentalist Christian government at that time.

My grandfather and the other Republicans who worked with him, were able and successful at stopping the religiously hysterical white fundamentalist Christian movement of these United States, in their attempt to overthrow the government under president Hoover, and to supplant the government president Hoover, with a white fundamentalist Christian government, which would in fact terminated the Constitution of these United States has supplanted it with the white fundamentalist Christian Bible.

And as everyone knows, if they know anything about my grandfather, he was a Jew.

That being said, what is in fact now here presented, is more than enough evidence, that the religiously hysterical, and politically hysterical, and politically a responsible white fundamentalist Christian movement, in these United States, and the religiously hysterical and politically hysterical white fundamentalist Christians are of the Republican Party, are now demonstrating with tremendous desperation, how fervent they are in their attempt to destroy the Constitution of these United States, and to destroy the two-party system in these United States. And so once again, the people of this country, and United States is exactly where it was in the battle of Washington in 1932. The United States is almost exactly where it was at the point of the Civil War in 1860. The United States is almost exactly where it was during the very eve of the signing of the Declaration of Independence. We are at a pivotal point between standing by the law of this nation, or caving in to religiously hysterical, and politically hysterical positions, such that those positions would destroy the Constitution and supplant the Constitution with the religiously hysterical. White fundamentalist Christian Bible. And by so doing, would then make it illegal to be any religion in these United States, other than white fundamentalist Christian. And then would give the white fundamentalist Christians, what I've always wanted ever since the beginning of this great nation. To have the right to kill any human being in these United States is not a white fundamentalist Christian. And then not killed, to have them put into prison, or made into slaves in this country.

I am, as I've said many times and has been proven, the last living survivor of the original four brothers of the Maschke family, who were the sons of the ancestor Maschke, who knew Moses Cleaveland, and who was in fact present at the battle of independence. And that same ancestor Maschke, who came to the area now known as Cleveland, Ohio with Moses Cleaveland, due in fact help settle this great area known as Cleveland, Ohio. I am that last survivor of this family, and the four brothers that the ancestor Maschke had as his sons. As an American Jew, and as a constitutionalist, which I've been all my life, I would admonish all. Legal experts, and all judges and judicial officials, throughout the entire United States to consider very carefully, the issue at and pursuant to this matter. For the Constitution, should never be compromised. It should never be looked upon as anything that is arbitrator will. For when we in fact arbitrate the Constitution, we then diminish the legality of all laws in this great nation. The law is a law. It can be nothing else. If we make it something else than the law is no longer the law. And if the law is no longer the law, then the United States is no longer based upon the law as well. And at the United States is no longer based on the law, it is done based on hysteria, whether that be religious hysteria or political hysteria. And once that happens, the continuity of history's Erie will in fact bear itself out. And we shall then again be at the very precipice of 1932, in 1860. Only this time, there does not seem to be a personality as strong as Abraham Lincoln to lead this through the complex twists and turns of constitutionality, pursuant to states rights as they apply to federal rights, as they apply to the basis of this great nation, which is not the hysterically religious vision fundamentalist Bible, but the Constitution of these United States of America.

End of line...
Love you,

Mickey


Happy Trails... Godspeed... Pay It Forward...

Email: mmaschke1506@gmail.com
GoogleTalk: mmaschke1506@gmail.com
The Copperwood Tree: http://mauricemaschke.livejournal.com/
My On-Line Profile: http://mauricemaschke.livejournal.com/profile
Home: 4802 Gedeon Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44102-6054
Telephone: 216-281-2696 Fax: 216-274-9941

Emergency Help:

The National Directory of 24 Hour Crisis Hotlines: http://www.allaboutcounseling.com/crisis_hotlines.htm
The National Directory of 24 Hour Suicide Hotlines: http://suicidehotlines.com/national.html

The Mind is like a book. Opened and much is learned. Closed and nothing is learned..