Minnesota's Democratic-Farm-Labor party has joined the strange crush to move the primaries as early as possible and will hold its caucus on 5. Feb, 2008. This date, nine months in advance of the actual general election, has gone from being known as 'Super Tuesday' to 'Super Duper Tuesday' and now even 'Tsunami Tuesday'. Your Curmudgeon has decided to just lump 'em all together, and will include any ridiculous hyperbole to follow in naming this day.
Whatever. Seriously. This rush to hold primaries earlier and earlier seems to speak volumes about the enthusiasm to end this criminal Republican regime's reign of error and terror. It also speaks volumes for the relative inability to collectively effect meaningful change on enthusiasm alone.
In fact, this 'me, too' phenomenon really doesn't work in our best interest at all. By moving towards a national primary system, the process of nomination becomes less of a result of reasoned conclusion and more a function of money, name-recognition, popularity, and more money. Notice please that "ideas" doesn't appear in that list. Neither does "vision", "plan", or "platform". Instead of a longer system by which the best candidates becomes the most popular through a process of discussion and argument about the issues, this new compacted system ensures that the candidates with the popularity, controlled marketed image. and money become the 'best'.
Given the sorry condition of our nation today, what is needed is vision, a plan, a rational and sane approach to solving problems, not more of the same damn popularity contests which have created the problems in the first place.
By deciding to also surf the Super Duper Tsunami Tuesday wave, Minnesota hopes to gain a greater share of the determination of the nomination, though of course the spin would replace 'greater' with 'proportional'. The thinking is, I suppose, that if the primaries occur more or less simultaneously, the voters may vote their actual conscience, rather than just voting for the lead dog. That might work, but in that case, it would make more sense to have the primaries later- more near the time of the conventions and general elections- so as to afford the nation the possibility to have the needed national discussions about the candidates and their platforms. Early primaries and caucuses merely afford us a greater chance to experience buyer's remorse.
It is entirely understandable to want to hasten regime change here. Actual, authentic, meaningful election reform could- and should- be a goal for the nation. When an administration goes rogue, we should be able to do more than just count down the years, months and days until the elections. But that is not what is happening with the compacted primary system- the only thing decided in the primary is the party nominee. The real election date remains where it is.
What could actual election reform look like? To be sure, your Curmudgeon has plenty of ideas about that- and will be addressing those issues in the future.