Why Recount When You Can Recant?
The unsettled Minnesota US Senate race between incumbent and notorious political windsock Norman "Bates" Coleman(D..no wait,R...whatever) and challenger Al "I'm Serious" Franken (D) entered a new phase of gratuitous trumped up controversy today when Coleman and his minions called into question the "large numbers of votes appearing for Franken," particularly in the traditionally Democratic Iron Range, implying that the race was being taken from them by fraud. Coleman had spent most of Wednesday declaring victory and making statements implying that the automatic recount required by state law was somehow a Franken initiative that should be abandoned for the good of the tax payers and "the healing process."
While your humble correspondent is willing to live with the process that is bound to resolve this eventually (particularly if the current trend holds), I have happened upon an idea that, if legally viable, could have the whole thing decided in much less time, much less expense, and far fewer lawyers than the recount/ lawsuit/ countersuit/ appeal process that seems inevitable at this point.
It goes like this: surely there are 300 Coleman voters out there (221 would do it at last count, but let's have a safety margin) who strongly regret having cast their ballots for a candidate whose every act since Wednesday morning reveals him to be a gratuitous political opportunist of the first water and a poster child for the sort of Rovian scumbaggery that we had hoped this election would end once and for all. If these folks can be found, and some legally binding way of recanting their votes can be devised, we could have this settled by Thanksgiving, easy.
Let the healing begin, Norm...